Content » Vol 98, Issue 2

Quiz

Six-month History of a Split Thumbnail: A Quiz

Yosuke Mai1, Hideyuki Ujiie1*, Takashi Anan1,3, Hajime Miyazawa1, Keisuke Imafuku1, Kokichi Hamasaka2 and Hiroshi Shimizu1

1Department of Dermatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, 2Hamasaka Skin Clinic, and 3Sapporo Institute of Dermatopathology, Sapporo, Japan. *E-mail: h-ujiie@med.hokudai.ac.jp

A 38-year-old man presented with a split right thumbnail. He had noticed the nail change 6 months earlier. Physical examination revealed a longitudinal split of the right thumbnail, accompanied by a skin-coloured papule on the proximal nail fold (Fig. 1a). It was initially suspected that a mucous cyst on the proximal nail fold had caused the nail change. The papule was punctured with an 18-gauge needle, but no mucous fluid was observed. A biopsy specimen of the papule on the proximal nail fold showed superficial perivascular lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates with a focal lichenoid pattern at the dermal–epidermal junction and mild spongiosis with a few necrotic keratinocytes in the epidermis (Fig. 1a–c). In addition, similar lymphocytic infiltrates were observed around the nail matrix (Fig. 1d). Notably, the eccrine glands and ducts were also involved (Fig. 1e).

What is your diagnosis? See next page for answer.


Fig. 1. Clinical presentation: a longitudinal split of the right thumbnail with a skin-coloured papule on the proximal nail fold. (a) Dotted circle indicates the biopsy site on the papule of the proximal nail fold. Arrow represents the longitudinal section. Histopathology of the proximal nail fold and around the nail matrix. (b) The dense lymphocytic infiltration in the proximal nail fold (square) and around the nail matrix (dotted square) (haematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification ×40). (c) Focal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates and mild spongiosis with a few necrotic keratinocytes (original magnification ×200, corresponding to the square in Fig. 1b). (d) Lymphocytic infiltrates around the nail matrix (original magnification ×200, corresponding to the dotted square). (e) Eccrine gland involvement in another section (original magnification ×200).

Click here to show the answer

Six-month History of a Split Thumbnail: A Commentary

Acta Derm Venereol 2017; XX: XX–XX.

Diagnosis: Nail lichen striatus

Nail changes are important indicators of various diseases and can sometimes be a diagnostic key (1). A nail split is caused by proximal nail matrix damage from trauma or physical pressure by tumours, such as glomus tumours (2, 3). Inflammation of the nail matrix can also result in a nail split (4).

Lichen striatus is an uncommon self-limited inflammatory dermatosis, which follows the Blaschko line (5). The lesions usually appear on the arms, legs and trunk, but the change may involve any site, such as the face. Nail involvement is rare. A study of 115 children with lichen striatus showed only 3 cases with nail changes (6). Although nail lichen striatus usually affects both nail and skin, 3 cases of lichen striatus limited to the nail have been reported (7). Nail abnormalities in lichen striatus are similar to those in lichen planus, presenting longitudinal ridging, splitting, onycholysis, nail pitting and/or shredding. Of these, a longitudinal nail split is the most common in nail lichen striatus (8). Whereas nail lichen planus damages the nails permanently (9), the nail changes of lichen striatus can resolve spontaneously (8).

The histopathological characteristics of nail lichen striatus resemble those of skin lichen striatus (7). In both, superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates, mild spongiosis with a few necrotic keratinocytes in the epidermis, hyperkeratosis and parakeratosis are diagnostic features (7, 8). In addition, eccrine extension of the infiltrates is a clue to diagnosis (10).

In the current case, a diagnosis of nail lichen striatus was made based on the clinical presentation of longitudinal nail split and the histopathological findings. The nail change has gradually improved with topical difluprednate ointment. In cases of longitudinal nail split, nail lichen striatus should be considered as a differential diagnosis.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES
  1. Singal A, Arora R. Nail as a window of systemic diseases. Indian Dermatol Online J 2015; 6: 67–74.
    View article    Google Scholar
  2. Zook EG, Guy RJ, Russell RC. A study of nail bed injuries: causes, treatment, and prognosis. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 247–252.
    View article    Google Scholar
  3. Verma SB. Glomus tumor-induced longitudinal splitting of nail mimicking median canaliform dystrophy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008; 74: 257–259.
    View article    Google Scholar
  4. Jiaravuthisan MM, Sasseville D, Vender RB, Murphy F, Muhn CY. Psoriasis of the nail: anatomy, pathology, clinical presentation, and a review of the literature on therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57: 1–27.
    View article    Google Scholar
  5. Taieb A, el Youbi A, Grosshans E, Maleville J. Lichen striatus: a Blaschko linear acquired inflammatory skin eruption. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 637–642.
    View article    Google Scholar
  6. Patrizi A, Neri I, Fiorentini C, Bonci A, Ricci G. Lichen striatus: clinical and laboratory features of 115 children. Pediatr Dermatol 2004; 21: 197–204.
    View article    Google Scholar
  7. Tosti A, Peluso AM, Misciali C, Cameli N. Nail lichen striatus: clinical features and long-term follow-up of five patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36: 908–913.
    View article    Google Scholar
  8. Kim M, Jung HY, Eun YS, Cho BK, Park HJ. Nail lichen striatus: report of seven cases and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54: 1255–1260.
    View article    Google Scholar
  9. Tosti A, Peluso AM, Fanti PA, Piraccini BM. Nail lichen planus: clinical and pathologic study of twenty-four patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28: 724–730.
    View article    Google Scholar
  10. Zhang Y, McNutt NS. Lichen striatus. Histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of 37 cases. J Cutan Pathol 2001; 28: 65–71.
    View article    Google Scholar